HomeCRYPTO NEWSRight here is How BIP-199 May 'Kill' Bitcoin In line with Andreas...

Right here is How BIP-199 May ‘Kill’ Bitcoin In line with Andreas Antonopoulos

adobestock 297754917 min
Supply: Adobe/Siarhei

Bitcoin (BTC) educator, creator, and entrepreneur Andreas Antonopoulos has voiced concern relating to a potential far-reaching consequence of the Bitcoin Enchancment Proposal (BIP) 119 that he says might “kill” Bitcoin.

Proposed by Jeremy Rubin, a Bitcoin developer and founding father of Bitcoin analysis and growth group Judica,  BIP-119, also referred to as CheckTemplateVerify (CTV), is a smooth fork proposal that goals to allow new use instances for the Bitcoin community by including a sort of “covenant.”

A covenant is analogous to what’s referred to as a wise contract on the Ethereum (ETH) blockchain. In easy phrases, a covenant is a mechanism that might allow customers to implement circumstances on the way in which BTC cash inside a pockets might be transferred sooner or later.

As of now, Bitcoin programmability is basically restricted to the bottom degree of transactions. For example, utilizing Bitcoin Script, a programmer can limit what might be achieved earlier than a transaction is spent. Equally, utilizing a timelock, one can set a selected period of time earlier than a transaction might be spent.

Covenant goals to carry extra programmability to Bitcoin by permitting programmers to manage how bitcoins might be spent sooner or later. Utilizing covenant, one would be capable to whitelist or blacklist sure addresses, limiting the place BTC might be spent even for the one that has the important thing to these bitcoins.

Sudden penalties

Whereas the creator of BIP-119 claims the proposal for CTV largely contains easy covenants, Antonopoulos has argued that the proposal might probably allow surprising or unintended penalties.

Extra particularly, Antonopoulos famous that the proposal might “kill” Bitcoin if it brings assist for recursive covenants. A recursive covenant is when a programmer not solely limits the following transaction but in addition “limits it in such a means that it limits the transaction after it, which limits the transaction after it, and many others,” he stated.

This is able to create very important challenges for Bitcoin. For example, utilizing a recursive covenant, a programmer might restrict the listing of addresses the place BTC could possibly be despatched sooner or later. This fashion, that particular BTC would not be fungible and would change into distinct from different bitcoins that may be despatched to everybody, principally creating a brand new class of bitcoins.

Furthermore, when customers have the flexibility to blacklist sure addresses, there’s a excessive chance that governments and regulators would step in and begin banning some addresses. 

“After which you’ll find yourself with basically PayPal, solely not very scalable,” Antonopoulos stated. “That is the way you kill Bitcoin.” 

It’s price noting that that is the worst-case situation. Nonetheless, there may be extra controversy across the proposal.

Extra notably, Rubin claims that BIP-119 is prepared and has requested for the improve to be carried out by way of the speedy trial course of, the place miners would have three or 4 months to sign assist for the proposal. Throughout this era, if greater than 95% of miners vote in assist of the proposal throughout any two weeks interval then it is going to be activated.

Nevertheless, for a proposal to be carried out, it wants large assist from customers, builders, wallets, and exchanges as properly – not solely miners. And if a proposal will get via with out assist from all these classes, it might even lead to a tough fork.

As of now, the proposal doesn’t appear to have overwhelming assist from all these classes, also referred to as constituencies of consensus, Antonopoulos stated. 

He added that the proposal additionally wants in depth testing, reviewing, and auditing earlier than it may be carried out.

Echoing this viewpoint, Adam Again, co-founder of the blockchain know-how firm Blockstream, stated that the proposal wants an intensive evaluate. He additionally argued that builders ought to think about different alternate options earlier than continuing.

“It is disappointing to see somebody make a run at bypassing or ignoring evaluate or regardless of the rationale,” he tweeted. Again acknowledged that there are “a number of alternate options which have been proposed on the dev-list.”

Equally, Matt Corallo, additionally a Blockstream co-founder and open supply engineer at Block/Spiral, opined that the push for BIP-119 feels “incorrect in nearly each means.” “As a substitute of collaborative engineering it appears like “I constructed this, lets do it” whereas ignoring any suggestions,” he wrote.

Rubin, nonetheless, has listed quite a few the explanation why he thinks the proposal is efficacious. Among the many extra notable benefits, the proposal would enhance Bitcoin programmability, enabling funds to be scheduled for a selected date or a number of dates.


Be taught extra: 
5 Tasks Enabling Sensible Contract Growth on Bitcoin
On BIP119, EU Regulatory Assault, El Salvador, and Extra

‘PoS Fanatics Attacking PoW are Precise Supervillains’, Kraken’s Powell Says as US Politicians Cost
Bitcoin Maintains Dominance Regardless of Large Proliferation of Altcoins

Bitcoin Lightning Community Funds Bounce Over 400%, 80M Customers Have Entry to Community
Taproot Adoption Stays Low, However Devs Say It Isn’t a Drawback for Bitcoin

Leave your vote


Most Popular

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

%d bloggers like this: